Home Ownership Is Not For Everyone
July 5, 2018
The homeownership rate has been increasing recently
following more than 10 years of decline. According to
the US Census, the rate peaked in the first quarter of 2005
at 69.1%, then declined to a low of 62.9% in the second
quarter of 2016. It has been creeping up since then,
reaching 64.2% in the first quarter of this year.
This may or may not be a good thing, depending on
how many of the new owners are NOHOs – my term for people
who should not be homeowners.
Defining a NOHO
The distinguishing feature of NOHOS that makes them
poor homeowners is not their income, family structure,
mobility, ethnicity, or where they live – rather, it is how
they live. Where successful homeowners live with at least
one foot in the future, and have learned how to delay some
gratifications for future rewards, NOHOs live from day to
day -- or week to week, or month to month, depending on how
often they are paid. Whatever they want, furthermore, they
want it now. Typically, they have nothing left at the end of
their pay period, and if they run out early, they have to
scrimp or borrow, usually at high interest rates.
When NOHOs make a costly purchase, such as a TV
set, they price it in terms of the monthly payment, which
they attempt to fit into their weekly or monthly budget.
They are easily seduced by offers of delayed payments and
long repayment terms, ignoring the high prices that
accompany such offers.
NOHOs sometimes write me about buying a house
because they have heard that owning is cheaper than renting.
They would buy a house in the same way they would buy a TV
set, by seeing if they can afford the monthly payment. In
most cases, they have no savings but have heard that it is
possible to get a loan for 100% of the sale price. I try to
discourage them by explaining the hidden costs and risks of
home ownership, and by pointing out that as owners, they
rather than the landlord are responsible for everything that
goes wrong.
NOHO Homeowners Have
Trouble With Property Taxes
Any bump in the road is enough to throw home-owning
NOHOs in the ditch. A common bump in the road is property
taxes. One who wrote me had calculated her monthly
obligation net of the tax deduction on the mortgage
interest, and fell behind on her payment because – something
she did not anticipate -- her tax saving did not become
available to her until year-end.
Another NOHO who wrote me was in serious trouble
almost immediately because the property tax estimate by the
lender turned out to be $200 a month too low. The NOHO said
he would not have purchased the house had he known the
correct figure. His house purchase plan had no margin for
error.
More often, NOHOs can manage the tax when they move
in but can’t manage a future tax increase. Of course,
property taxes are known to rise, if not this year then
next, it doesn’t take a lot of foresight to expect it. But
foresight is in short supply among NOHOs.
Screening Out NOHO Home Buyers:
the Down Payment Requirement
In the 1920s, NOHOs were all renters because
mortgage lenders required house purchasers to put 40% down.
Since NOHOs can’t save, they can’t make a down payment. The
problem was that the high down payment requirement screened
out many potential homeowners who were not NOHOS, especially
first-time home buyers, for whom our society seems to have a
weak spot. Over the years the screen has been much loosened.
On FHA-insured loans, the requirement declined from
20% in 1934 to 3.5% today. Loans purchased by Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac today require 5% down, though first-time buyers
can qualify for 3%. Veterans can obtain VA mortgages with no
down payment, and the Department of Agriculture offers them
to low-income purchasers in rural areas.
An alternative way of liberalizing the down payment
screen is to allow the payment to come from someone other
than the borrower. We have had a number of these, and some
are more likely to allow NOHOs to avoid the screen than
others.
Helping First-Time Buyers Who Are
Not NOHOs
Allowing a third party to make a down payment for a
borrower in most cases is a better way to screen out NOHOs
than a no down payment program that relies entirely on a
credit evaluation. The third party is risking its
contribution based on knowledge of the borrower. This is
true of contributions made by family members, for whom
assistance is a vote of confidence by those who usually know
the borrower best. To some degree it is also true of
investors who negotiate a share of future property
appreciation. Several programs of this sort have arisen in
recent years. It is not the case with home sellers,
who can be depended upon to raise the house price by enough
to cover their contribution.
The NOHO Cure
It isn’t easy but NOHOs can cure themselves by changing their lifestyle. The key change is to reverse their practice of treating savings as a residual – what is left at the end of the pay period after all expenses have been made. The residual system doesn’t work for NOHOs because they never have anything left. A way to shift priorities is to make a deposit into a special savings account immediately after receiving income, so that spending is limited to what remains. It can work for those determined to make it work.