Refinancing in a Rising-Rate/Rising-Property-Value Market
(Second of a Series)
(Second of a Series)
While
rising interest rates have sharply reduced the number of mortgage
borrowers who can refinance into a lower rate, rising home prices create
opportunities for some borrowers to refinance into mortgages that are
less costly in other respects. One possibility, discussed in my article
of last week, is to refinance a mortgage carrying mortgage insurance
into one that doesn’t require mortgage insurance. Another possibility,
the subject of this article, is to refinance a piggyback – a combination
of a first and a (more costly) second mortgage -- into a solo first
mortgage.
Piggybacks as an Alternative to Mortgage Insurance Before
the Crisis: Piggybacks that combined a first mortgage equal
to 80% of property value with a second mortgage of 5, 10, 15 or 20% of
value grew rapidly during the years preceding the financial crisis. The
major attraction to borrowers was that the monthly payment on the second
mortgage was less than the alternative monthly mortgage insurance
premium.
The lower payments on piggybacks reflected their modest interest
rates – lenders under-estimated default risk because of the high rate of
house price appreciation. A widespread practice, furthermore, was to
make the payment of the second mortgage interest only for the first 10
years. In some cases, the second mortgage was an adjustable rate line of
credit, called a HELOC, with low initial rates but high potential for
future rate increases.
The Crisis Shake-out: The decline in house
values associated with the financial crisis was the largest and most
widespread decline since the 1930s. Many of the borrowers with piggyback
loans found that the equity in their homes was negative, and the default
rate on second mortgages soared.
While investors in second mortgages that had little or no equity
protecting them had little incentive to foreclose, borrowers remained
liable. The second mortgage lender could prevent the borrower from
selling the house, or modifying the terms of their first mortgage. Many
borrowers discovered the hard way that when things go wrong, it is
better to have mortgage insurance than a second mortgage.
Yet many piggyback borrowers survived the crisis unscathed. They did
not default or tarnish their credit, and their homes are in areas where
house prices have fully recovered. These borrowers could benefit from
refinancing today.
The Refinancing Option For Piggyback Survivors:
To examine the option, I assumed a home buyer paid $300,000 in May of
2004, took a 30-year first mortgage of $240,000 at a fixed 5.5% and a
piggyback for $60,000 at a fixed 7.5%, with interest only payments for
10 years. I brought these loans up to date by amortizing the payments,
taking account of the 10-year delay in amortizing the second. The
balances on the first and second mortgages would be paid down to
$173,179 and $53,810 as of June 2018.
I assumed that the value of the borrower’s house followed the pattern
of national prices as measured by the house price series published by
the Federal Housing Finance Agency. The average annual increase over the
period May 2004 to June 2018 was only 2.35% because the period covered
included the sharp price drop following the financial crisis in 07.
Using 2.35% as an estimate, the $300,000 house of May 2004 is worth
$417,000 today. The current balance of the two mortgages, adding to
$226,989 is only 54% of current property value. The borrower can
refinance without having to buy mortgage insurance or take another
piggyback.
Assuming the owner’s credit is good, on June 8 she could have
obtained a no-cash out refinance at 4.375% from one of the lenders who
report their prices to my web site, with a total upfront cost of $4952.
Entering these data in my calculator 3b, it would take only 18 months
for the lower interest costs to cover the refinance cost.
If the borrower had a HELOC rather than a fixed-rate mortgage, the
cost saving from refinancing would be smaller because of the lower
interest rate. However, refinancing into a fixed-rate would eliminate
the borrower’s exposure to a rate increase.
Post-Crisis Piggybacks: While new piggybacks
disappeared for some years after the crisis, they began to emerge again
3 or 4 years ago. The earliest of them were just in time to benefit from
an acceleration of house price increases. The house price index referred
to earlier rose by 5.9% a year during the 4 years ending March 2018, and
6.3% during the final 3 years of that period.
A home purchased for $400,000 in 2014 that appreciated by 5.9% a year would be worth $506,000 after 4 years. This appreciation would allow the owner to refinance a 20% piggyback mortgage of $80,000, plus the existing first mortgage of $320,000 into a new first mortgage of $400,000.
Concluding Comment: Post-crisis piggyback borrowers are able to refinance out of it after just a few years, without having to suffer through a crisis. That’s their good fortune.